Skip to main content

Marketplaces in the financial industry - Here to stay?


Marketplaces are hip and trendy on the internet and will likely evolve even more in the near future. In some markets (like food delivery, transportation, commerce, holiday…​) they already represent double digit market shares (e.g. in 2018 $1.86 trillion was spent globally on the top 100 online marketplaces), but for the financial services sector, their impact (even though there are a few unicorn FinTechs in this space) on the industry is still limited.

Any form of intermediation (travel agents, taxi dispatchers…​) will likely be replaced by a modern, digital and more direct equivalent, i.e. a digital marketplace. As the business of banks is exactly the intermediation between people having excess money and people needing money, the financial services sector will be significantly impacted.

Furthermore, marketplaces are strongly intertwined with other concepts like the gig-economy, the sharing-economy and the API-economy. All these trends will ultimately lead to

  • More flexible, short term jobs (gig-economy), e.g. all Uber taxi drivers are independent

  • People owning less assets:

    • Share assets in a user-friendly and controlled way or

    • "Everything as a Service" (e.g. Amazon Prime, Uber Eat subscription…​)

  • Outsourcing all day-to-day household jobs (cleaning, cooking, driving, shopping, groceries…​)

  • A limited set of distribution access points on the internet selling items and services from different "Product Factories" (e.g. a very big part of Amazon’s revenues is already made from 3rd party vendors selling their products on the Amazon platform)

All this will impact the financial services sector even more. Especially the rise of Open Banking APIs (currently only in cash accounts and payments space via PSD2, but likely also for other domains in the future) will allow to create marketplaces on top of the financial industry, instead of the current marketplaces, which aim to create a sort of financial system next to the existing one.

But before going into more details about the characteristics and trends of digital marketplaces, it’s probably a good idea to first define, what we understand under the term "digital marketplace" (as this buzz-word has become so overloaded, that there is no unique definition anymore). For me, a "digital marketplace" is a system, which meets below 3 criteria:

  • A platform, i.e. a stand-alone software solution, which is open for users to onboard independent from other software solutions

  • Multi-tenant, i.e. multiple parties can work together on the same application instance, while still respecting certain security/privacy rules, so that not all data is available to anyone

  • A place which brings together multiple parties with different needs(parties which offer something and parties which search something):

    • Minimum 2 party types (consumer & producers) - but more is possible (e.g. broker/intermediary/…​)

    • For each party type there are minimum 2 actors (but usually more).

The most important part in this definition is the fact that it groups X consumers with Y producers. This is where a marketplace deviates from most SaaS software solutions and corporate websites (e.g. internet banking solution of a bank), as typically you only have 1 producer on those platforms.

This double-sided nature of a marketplace gives some interesting dynamics. Where a typical company only needs to grow out its customer base, a marketplace needs to grow out both sides and preferably keep them balanced (otherwise 1 side will be disatisfied and leave the marketplace, after which the other side automatically will leave as well). This means a marketplace typically struggles with a "Chicken and Egg" problem in the beginning, but once passed this point, a marketplace can scale exponentially thanks to its enormous scale/network effects (i.e. not burdened by constraints of conventional transactional businesses like inventory supply and balance sheet). Furthermore, once a marketplace is established, it is enormously sticky and tends to grow to a monopoly.

Other dynamics of a marketplace are:

  • High initial cost (lot of initial capital required) for implementing the platform and getting the critical mass (i.e. high customer acquisition cost)

  • Once operational and critical mass is achieved, very limited capital cost, as inventory is brought by the (external) suppliers

  • Hard to control quality, as quality is not directly under the control of the marketplace, but rather distributed to the different parties acting on the marketplace

  • Hard to avoid that producers and consumers don’t match on the marketplace, but execute outside the marketplace (to avoid any commission linked to the marketplace)

  • Marketplaces need to establish trust between producers and consumers (parties which didn’t interact directly before onboarding on the marketplace). This can be obtained via several mechanisms, like a due diligence during the onboarding process, party rating, reviews, asking collaterals, marketplace providing guarantees and/or insurances…​

  • Marketplaces need to provide autonomous value. This means providing value-added services that benefit producers and consumers beyond the transaction.

Given these dynamics, it is safe to say, that financial service incumbents(banks and insurers) are ideally positioned to build out marketplaces:

  • Banks & insurers have cheap access to capital, required to back the high initial cost of a new marketplace

  • Banks & insurers have a strong brand, which is required to promote a marketplace

  • Banks & insurers have strong trust reputation, providing the necessary trust for consumers and producers to transact

  • Banks & insurers already have a large customer base, allowing to jump-start the platform directly with a critical mass

  • Banks & insurers can profit from a lot of cross-selling opportunitiesfor financial products/services

  • Banks & Insurers have already (multi-lingual) large customer contact centers, which can be used to operate the platform

  • Most products and services linked to the financial services industry are high-value, high-frequency transactions, which is the sweet spot for a marketplace.

The biggest hurdle for the incumbents is however their low agility and low delivery speed. This can be tackled by creating a dedicated team, which has the mandate to be autonomous and flexible (i.e. create a FinTech within the bank/insurer). While it is difficult to create such autonomous teams for the typical projects within a bank/insurer, it is much easier when setting up a new marketplace, thanks to its isolation from the rest of the application architecture. This separation of the existing architecture and processes gives the additional advantage that the marketplace can be easily spinned-off in a later phase, which is a necessity for ensuring the independence of the marketplace and thus the further expansion of the marketplace.

Of course, everything will start with a good idea for a new marketplace in the financial services industry.
Different techniques can be used to find this good idea:

  • Top-down: brainstorming for new ideas of marketplaces. Once ideas are found, evaluate them on their market potential.

  • Bottom-up: build up ideas by searching for markets which meet the target requirements of a successful marketplace or by combining different classification axes for marketplaces (see below).

In both scenarios, we use 2 tools:

  • Evaluating the business potential of a marketplace

  • Classifying a marketplace according to its characteristics (allowing to easily map to comparable marketplaces, so that ideas and components from those similar marketplaces can be harvested)

The evaluation of the business potential is done via 5 axes:

  • Fragmentation of the market: does the market have a lot of small players (i.e. a variety of producers and consumers) or is the market already consolidated to a few large players. The more fragmented the market, the more potential for a successful marketplace.

  • Transparency of the market: is the market transparent, i.e. easy to compare offers of different producers, are prices publicly available, is it easy to understand how pricing calculations are done…​ The more intransparent a market is, the more potential for a successful marketplace.

  • Market size: is there a large market and is this market still growing or already consolidated. Small markets, which are not expected to grow soon, are to be avoided. However, markets which are small now, might be small due to the lack of a digital marketplace.

  • Monetization potential: how easy is it to ask a commission or fee for the service offered by the marketplace and if so, what is the frequency a user will transaction and what is the amount for which he will typically transact. High-frequency, high-value marketplaces are ideal, but as long as 1 of the 2 criteria (i.e. transaction frequency and amount) is "high" a marketplace can be successful. E.g. Uber is a high-frequency, low-value marketplace, but is definitely successful.

  • Existing competition: are there already good digital marketplaces or equivalent offers in the market? Evidently a flooded market should be avoided as well.

The classification of a financial services marketplace can be done via multiple axes:

  • Type of intermediated item

    • Money (asset/liability)

    • Product (a good, including property)

    • Service (a skill)

    • People

    • Data/Information

  • Type of consumer (= investor)

    • Bank

    • Corporate

    • (Physical) Person

  • Type of producer (= issuer/supplier)

    • Bank

    • Corporate

    • (Physical) Person

  • Number of parties actively involved in the transaction (i.e. taking an active decision via a non-automated manual activity)

    • Two (Producer/Consumer)

    • More than 2 (e.g. producer, consumer and broker/dealer)

  • Supply limitations

    • Supply is limited (product catalogue shows the available supply)

    • Supply is virtually unlimited

  • Method for transaction handling

    • Double-commit: both producer and consumer need to manually agree on conditions to transact. Typical example is a job offer marketplace.

    • Buyer-pick: producer enters his offer (with availability) and consumer can transact directly on the offer (e.g. Airbnb)

    • Supplier-pick: consumer posts a request and supplier claims it (e.g. Uber)

Taking the example of P2P lending for Retail customers (i.e. a physical person can lend directly money to another physical person facilitated via the platform), we can evaluate the business potential and classification of this use case:

  • Business potential

    • Fragmentation: medium to high fragmentation, with a lot of players in the lending market (i.e. credit agencies, banks…​)

    • Transparency: market is already quite transparent, i.e. prices are quite similar for different institutions and are publicly available on the internet. Furthermore price visualization is often standardized (e.g. via SECCI in European Union).

    • Market size: the loan market is still growing, but only with a few percent a year. The P2P loan market can however still grow exponentially by cannibalizing the existing credit market, as customers search for higher returns for investments and lower interest rates for financing.

    • Monetization potential: a commission on a sold loan can be easily requested. Furthermore, situated here in a "low frequency, high value" space, the monetization is guaranteed.

    • Existing competition: competition is fierce, as dozens of P2P lending platforms have flooded the market in recent year. E.g. in the peer-to-peer lending space in the UK alone there are over 100 different platforms. Furthermore, incumbent banks are digitalizing their credit origination processes more and more, making the existing financing options also more efficient and user friendly.

  • Classification

    • Type of intermediated item = Money

    • Type of consumer = Physical Person

    • Type of producer = Physical Person

    • Number of parties actively involved in the transaction = Two (Producer/Consumer)

    • Supply limitations = Supply is limited (only customers wanting to lend money)

    • Method for transaction handling = Buyer-pick (investor can subscribe directly to a loan posted on the platform)

As this article aims to demonstrate, the potential for digital marketplaces is enormous, but an initiative in this space is not just another implementation project. A marketplace has very specific dynamics and characteristics, which are very different from traditional software solutions. Careful upfront research before diving in such a project is there essential.

Comments

  1. If you want to get on onboard with an online food ordering and delivery app and a website with your own brand name and logo but don't want to invest a lot of money, the monthly Subscription-Based Food Delivery App Solution is perfect for you.

    ReplyDelete
  2. https://ronkstard.blogspot.com/2021/05/online-selling-platform-malaysia-e.html?showComment=1627288689658#c3986632059032109080

    ReplyDelete
  3. top online market places Thank you again for all the knowledge u distribute,Good post. I was very interested in the article, it's quite inspiring I should admit. I like visiting you site since I always come across interesting articles like this one.Great Job, I greatly appreciate that.Do Keep sharing! Regards,

    ReplyDelete
  4. I really like your take on the issue. I now have a clear idea on what this matter is all about.. dark0de market url

    ReplyDelete
  5. I know this is one of the most meaningful information for me. And I'm animated reading your article. But should remark on some general things, the website style is perfect; the articles are great. Thanks for the ton of tangible and attainable help. dark0de market link

    ReplyDelete
  6. I completely agree with you. It is convenient to shop online. You are not required to dress and drive to your preferred retailer. You may easily go to their website, find what you're looking for, and purchase it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. When someone is looking for financial advice, they are going to need to make sure that they have someone who is reputable providing this information.
    Thanks
    Leading Financial Advisory Firm UAE
    Financial Consultants & Advisors Dubai
    Best Investment Consultants in Dubai
    Investment consulting firms in Dubai
    Best health insurance plans Dubai


    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks for posting this blog.
    .
    .
    Are you looking for a financial services pr agency to drive awareness and sales for your business? The following is a comprehensive guide with top public relations companies working within the financial services industry. This can help you choose the right financial services pr agency for you- Look at the reputation of a certain company, take a look at the company portfolio, analyze their experience in your market niche.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thanks for the posting.Nice blog.
    As the business of banks is exactly the intermediation between people having excess money and people needing money, the financial services sector will be significantly impacted-that is the main fact.
    Are you ready to take your team to the next level? then let take help of Gray Feather Financial to unlock your team's true potential and take your business to the next level.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Impressive writing and content presentation, useful too, hope so you keep sharing. You can also check our work at Vic Collect

    ReplyDelete
  11. Marketplaces in the financial industry play diverse roles in facilitating transactions, managing risks, providing investment opportunities, and supporting economic activities. They range from traditional exchanges for stocks and bonds to innovative platforms for crowdfunding, P2P lending, and cryptocurrencies, reflecting the evolving landscape of financial services and technology integration. Each marketplace serves distinct purposes and audiences, contributing to the overall efficiency and dynamism of the global financial system. Best Cash Flow Forecasting Software | Financial Forecasting Strategy

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Transforming the insurance sector to an Open API Ecosystem

1. Introduction "Open" has recently become a new buzzword in the financial services industry, i.e.   open data, open APIs, Open Banking, Open Insurance …​, but what does this new buzzword really mean? "Open" refers to the capability of companies to expose their services to the outside world, so that   external partners or even competitors   can use these services to bring added value to their customers. This trend is made possible by the technological evolution of   open APIs (Application Programming Interfaces), which are the   digital ports making this communication possible. Together companies, interconnected through open APIs, form a true   API ecosystem , offering best-of-breed customer experience, by combining the digital services offered by multiple companies. In the   technology sector   this evolution has been ongoing for multiple years (think about the travelling sector, allowing you to book any hotel online). An excellent example of this

Are product silos in a bank inevitable?

Silo thinking   is often frowned upon in the industry. It is often a synonym for bureaucratic processes and politics and in almost every article describing the threats of new innovative Fintech players on the banking industry, the strong bank product silos are put forward as one of the main blockages why incumbent banks are not able to (quickly) react to the changing customer expectations. Customers want solutions to their problems   and do not want to be bothered about the internal organisation of their bank. Most banks are however organized by product domain (daily banking, investments and lending) and by customer segmentation (retail banking, private banking, SMEs and corporates). This division is reflected both at business and IT side and almost automatically leads to the creation of silos. It is however difficult to reorganize a bank without creating new silos or introducing other types of issues and inefficiencies. An organization is never ideal and needs to take a number of cons

RPA - The miracle solution for incumbent banks to bridge the automation gap with neo-banks?

Hypes and marketing buzz words are strongly present in the IT landscape. Often these are existing concepts, which have evolved technologically and are then renamed to a new term, as if it were a brand new technology or concept. If you want to understand and assess these new trends, it is important to   reduce the concepts to their essence and compare them with existing technologies , e.g. Integration (middleware) software   ensures that 2 separate applications or components can be integrated in an easy way. Of course, there is a huge evolution in the protocols, volumes of exchanged data, scalability, performance…​, but in essence the problem remains the same. Nonetheless, there have been multiple terms for integration software such as ETL, ESB, EAI, SOA, Service Mesh…​ Data storage software   ensures that data is stored in such a way that data is not lost and that there is some kind guaranteed consistency, maximum availability and scalability, easy retrieval and searching

IoT - Revolution or Evolution in the Financial Services Industry

1. The IoT hype We have all heard about the   "Internet of Things" (IoT)   as this revolutionary new technology, which will radically change our lives. But is it really such a revolution and will it really have an impact on the Financial Services Industry? To refresh our memory, the Internet of Things (IoT) refers to any   object , which is able to   collect data and communicate and share this information (like condition, geolocation…​)   over the internet . This communication will often occur between 2 objects (i.e. not involving any human), which is often referred to as Machine-to-Machine (M2M) communication. Well known examples are home thermostats, home security systems, fitness and health monitors, wearables…​ This all seems futuristic, but   smartphones, tablets and smartwatches   can also be considered as IoT devices. More importantly, beside these futuristic visions of IoT, the smartphone will most likely continue to be the center of the connected devi

PSD3: The Next Phase in Europe’s Payment Services Regulation

With the successful rollout of PSD2, the European Union (EU) continues to advance innovation in the payments domain through the anticipated introduction of the   Payment Services Directive 3 (PSD3) . On June 28, 2023, the European Commission published a draft proposal for PSD3 and the   Payment Services Regulation (PSR) . The finalized versions of this directive and associated regulation are expected to be available by late 2024, although some predictions suggest a more likely timeline of Q2 or Q3 2025. Given that member states are typically granted an 18-month transition period, PSD3 is expected to come into effect sometime in 2026. Notably, the Commission has introduced a regulation (PSR) alongside the PSD3 directive, ensuring more harmonization across member states as regulations are immediately effective and do not require national implementation, unlike directives. PSD3 shares the same objectives as PSD2, i.e.   increasing competition in the payments landscape and enhancing consum

Trade-offs Are Inevitable in Software Delivery - Remember the CAP Theorem

In the world of financial services, the integrity of data systems is fundamentally reliant on   non-functional requirements (NFRs)   such as reliability and security. Despite their importance, NFRs often receive secondary consideration during project scoping, typically being reduced to a generic checklist aimed more at compliance than at genuine functionality. Regrettably, these initial NFRs are seldom met after delivery, which does not usually prevent deployment to production due to the vague and unrealistic nature of the original specifications. This common scenario results in significant end-user frustration as the system does not perform as expected, often being less stable or slower than anticipated. This situation underscores the need for   better education on how to articulate and define NFRs , i.e. demanding only what is truly necessary and feasible within the given budget. Early and transparent discussions can lead to system architecture being tailored more closely to realisti

Low- and No-code platforms - Will IT developers soon be out of a job?

“ The future of coding is no coding at all ” - Chris Wanstrath (CEO at GitHub). Mid May I posted a blog on RPA (Robotic Process Automation -   https://bankloch.blogspot.com/2020/05/rpa-miracle-solution-for-incumbent.html ) on how this technology, promises the world to companies. A very similar story is found with low- and no-code platforms, which also promise that business people, with limited to no knowledge of IT, can create complex business applications. These   platforms originate , just as RPA tools,   from the growing demand for IT developments , while IT cannot keep up with the available capacity. As a result, an enormous gap between IT teams and business demands is created, which is often filled by shadow-IT departments, which extend the IT workforce and create business tools in Excel, Access, WordPress…​ Unfortunately these tools built in shadow-IT departments arrive very soon at their limits, as they don’t support the required non-functional requirements (like high availabili

An overview of 1-year blogging

Last week I published my   60th post   on my blog called   Bankloch   (a reference to "Banking" and my family name). The past year, I have published a blog on a weekly basis, providing my humble personal vision on the topics of Fintech, IT software delivery and mobility. This blogging has mainly been a   personal enrichment , as it forced me to dive deep into a number of different topics, not only in researching for content, but also in trying to identify trends, innovations and patterns into these topics. Furthermore it allowed me to have several very interesting conversations and discussions with passionate colleagues in the financial industry and to get more insights into the wonderful world of blogging and more general of digital marketing, exploring subjects and tools like: Search Engine Optimization (SEO) LinkedIn post optimization Google Search Console Google AdWorks Google Blogger Thinker360 Finextra …​ Clearly it is   not easy to get the necessary attention . With th

Deals as a competitive differentiator in the financial sector

In my blog " Customer acquisition cost: probably the most valuable metric for Fintechs " ( https://bankloch.blogspot.com/2020/06/customer-acquisition-cost-probably-most.html ) I described how a customer acquisition strategy can make or break a Fintech. In the traditional Retail sector, focused on selling different types of products for personal usage to end-customers,   customer acquisition  is just as important. No wonder that the advertisement sector is a multi-billion dollar industry. However in recent years due to the digitalization and consequently the rise of   Digital Marketing , customer acquisition has become much more focused on   delivering the right message via the right channel to the right person on the right time . Big tech players like Google and Facebook are specialized in this kind of targeted marketing, which is a key factor for their success and multi-billion valuations. Their exponential growth in marketing revenues seems however coming to a halt, as digi

AI in Financial Services - A buzzword that is here to stay!

In a few of my most recent blogs I tried to   demystify some of the buzzwords   (like blockchain, Low- and No-Code platforms, RPA…​), which are commonly used in the financial services industry. These buzzwords often entail interesting innovations, but contrary to their promise, they are not silver bullets solving any problem. Another such buzzword is   AI   (or also referred to as Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Enforced Learning…​ - the difference between those terms put aside). Again this term is also seriously hyped, creating unrealistic expectations, but contrary to many other buzzwords, this is something I truly believe will have a much larger impact on the financial services industry than many other buzzwords. This opinion is backed by a study of McKinsey and PWC indicating that 72% of company leaders consider that AI will be the most competitive advantage of the future and that this technology will be the most disruptive force in the decades to come. Deep Learning (= DL) is a s