Is centralization inevitable when making DeFi available to the masses?

In recent years, I have delved into the domains of DeFi (decentralized finance), Web3, blockchain, and cryptocurrencies, building a solid understanding (although far from being an expert) of their underlying concepts and technologies. Nonetheless, I continue to grapple with the business and economic aspects surrounding these innovations. Surprisingly, there are very few articles focusing on the economics of DeFi and blockchain businesses and this in sheer contrast to the enormous amount of content focusing on the technology and the innovative and disruptive nature of this technology.

As an engineer, I find the technology behind permissionless decentralized blockchains and smart contracts immensely captivating. However, as a business and functional analyst, I struggle to discern the business dynamics: the viability of the business case, the definition of customer support models and the customer journeys both in happy and unhappy flows. Unfortunately, these critical aspects seem to receive inadequate attention within the Blockchain and DeFi community.

In the end these questions do not come from the underlying blockchain technology, but rather from the discussion between decentralized and centralized finance. The core distinctive feature of Web3 is also the decentralization of business models.

The central question, persistently unanswered in discussions on DeFi and Blockchain, revolves around the viability of decentralized models within our current capitalist framework, which heavily relies on centralized entities that generate profit by offering services while assuming responsibility, risk, and accountability.

Several instances exemplify this tension between decentralization and centralization within the crypto space:

Bitcoin: originally intended as a fully decentralized creation governed by the masses, Bitcoin has succumbed to the dominance of a few centralized players (crypto-miners and exchanges), which are so dominant that they can also influence the future of Bitcoin.
Ethereum: the shift from "Proof of Work" to "Proof of Stake" reduces costs and ecological impact but raises concerns of increased centralization.
NFTs: initially a purely virtual concept, NFTs have evolved to include extra services and perks outside the blockchain. Organizing these physical world benefits necessitates involvement from centralized companies, eroding the decentralization aspect.
Stable Coins: while offering a lot of potential for mainstream adoption and direct payments, stable coins introduce a level of centralization, as they require an underlying issuer to maintain reserves in fiat currency, ensuring the stability of the coin.
Crypto-Exchanges: these platforms create significant centralization by providing centralized management, facilitating fiat-to-crypto conversions (via off- and on-ramping), and offering virtual wallets for private key storage.
Open-Source Projects: even projects with open-source code often rely on a single company or a handful of entities for development. These companies are often rewarded through Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs), but those introduce clearly also a strong conflict of interest (and centralization).

Currently, the crypto community remains relatively closed and niche, comprising individuals with technical expertise and an anti-establishment mindset. However, as crypto becomes more mainstream, attracting larger financial institutions and less tech-savvy users, the gravitational pull toward centralization intensifies. This shift is driven by various factors, including

Regulators need to have a party to talk to and regulators will impose more and more restrictions (e.g. on KYC or AML) when crypto become more mainstream (cfr. MiCA directive in EU)
Lobbying requires a central authority
Users (especially companies) want to have a juridical agreementwith a party, so they can take legal action in case of issues
Users want to be able to call someone in case of questions/support
Users need much better and more user-friendly interfaces, which require much more design and coding (which needs again to be organized, most likely by a central entity)
Marketing is needed to convince users to use the new platform (e.g. take away fear about security & fraud issues)

In the end centralization allows more simplicity, especially for users with little technical knowledge.
And if centralization is ultimately inevitable, for reasons which are non technical, the question can be raised if blockchain is then still the best technological choice (and not a centralized database with certain encryption and non-permutation capabilities on top of it).
Some people argue that blockchain can form an alternative ecosystem alongside traditional systems, as innovating within the existing payment ecosystem is too challenging due to dependencies and technical constraints. While a valid argument, it seems somewhat contrived, as a more efficient and modern alternative ecosystem could also be built using centralized technologies with added encryption and non-permutation capabilities.

Blockchain technology is still searching for widespread product market fit. In developed countries, cryptocurrencies serving as investment assets, represent the only use case with substantial market adoption. Other use cases, often leveraging blockchain in traditional platforms, tend to be less user-friendly and fail to provide significant added value for the average user. Blockchain enthusiasts argue that security, privacy, and decentralization provide sufficient value in themselves, but these qualities are challenging to grasp and quantify for most users.
In emerging countries, the situation may be more promising due to the lack of banking infrastructure, a substantial unbanked population, untrustworthy governments, high inflation rates and high transaction costs.

As the crypto world evolves and attracts substantial investment from business experts, it is essential to acknowledge potential blind spots and engage in discussions that move beyond the ideological (almost religious) debate of centralized vs. decentralized. Instead, the focus should be on how mainstream users can derive value from DeFi and Web3 and how these models can be organized to address unhappy scenarios (e.g. a user having a question or something goes wrong). By addressing these concerns and striking a balance between decentralization and centralization, the crypto community can pave the way for broader adoption and integration within the traditional financial system.

Comments

Transforming the insurance sector to an Open API Ecosystem

1. Introduction "Open" has recently become a new buzzword in the financial services industry, i.e. open data, open APIs, Open Banking, Open Insurance …, but what does this new buzzword really mean? "Open" refers to the capability of companies to expose their services to the outside world, so that external partners or even competitors can use these services to bring added value to their customers. This trend is made possible by the technological evolution of open APIs (Application Programming Interfaces), which are the digital ports making this communication possible. Together companies, interconnected through open APIs, form a true API ecosystem , offering best-of-breed customer experience, by combining the digital services offered by multiple companies. In the technology sector this evolution has been ongoing for multiple years (think about the travelling sector, allowing you to book any hotel online). An excellent example of this

Are product silos in a bank inevitable?

Silo thinking is often frowned upon in the industry. It is often a synonym for bureaucratic processes and politics and in almost every article describing the threats of new innovative Fintech players on the banking industry, the strong bank product silos are put forward as one of the main blockages why incumbent banks are not able to (quickly) react to the changing customer expectations. Customers want solutions to their problems and do not want to be bothered about the internal organisation of their bank. Most banks are however organized by product domain (daily banking, investments and lending) and by customer segmentation (retail banking, private banking, SMEs and corporates). This division is reflected both at business and IT side and almost automatically leads to the creation of silos. It is however difficult to reorganize a bank without creating new silos or introducing other types of issues and inefficiencies. An organization is never ideal and needs to take a number of cons

RPA - The miracle solution for incumbent banks to bridge the automation gap with neo-banks?

Hypes and marketing buzz words are strongly present in the IT landscape. Often these are existing concepts, which have evolved technologically and are then renamed to a new term, as if it were a brand new technology or concept. If you want to understand and assess these new trends, it is important to reduce the concepts to their essence and compare them with existing technologies , e.g. Integration (middleware) software ensures that 2 separate applications or components can be integrated in an easy way. Of course, there is a huge evolution in the protocols, volumes of exchanged data, scalability, performance…, but in essence the problem remains the same. Nonetheless, there have been multiple terms for integration software such as ETL, ESB, EAI, SOA, Service Mesh… Data storage software ensures that data is stored in such a way that data is not lost and that there is some kind guaranteed consistency, maximum availability and scalability, easy retrieval and searching

IoT - Revolution or Evolution in the Financial Services Industry

1. The IoT hype We have all heard about the "Internet of Things" (IoT) as this revolutionary new technology, which will radically change our lives. But is it really such a revolution and will it really have an impact on the Financial Services Industry? To refresh our memory, the Internet of Things (IoT) refers to any object , which is able to collect data and communicate and share this information (like condition, geolocation…) over the internet . This communication will often occur between 2 objects (i.e. not involving any human), which is often referred to as Machine-to-Machine (M2M) communication. Well known examples are home thermostats, home security systems, fitness and health monitors, wearables… This all seems futuristic, but smartphones, tablets and smartwatches can also be considered as IoT devices. More importantly, beside these futuristic visions of IoT, the smartphone will most likely continue to be the center of the connected devi

Neobanks should find their niche to improve their profitability

The last 5 years dozens of so-called neo- or challenger banks (according to Exton Consulting 256 neobanks are in circulation today) have disrupted the banking landscape, by offering a fully digitized (cfr. "tech companies with a banking license"), very customer-centric, simple and fluent (e.g. possibility to become client and open an account in a few clicks) and low-cost product and service offering. While several of them are already valued at billions of euros (like Revolut, Monzo, Chime, N26, NuBank…), very few of them are expected to be profitable in the coming years and even less are already profitable today (Accenture research shows that the average UK neobank loses $11 per user yearly). These challenger banks are typically confronted with increasing costs, while the margins generated per customer remain low (e.g. due to the offering of free products and services or above market-level saving account interest rates). While it’s obvious that disrupting the financial ma

Can Augmented Reality make daily banking a more pleasant experience?

With the increased competition in the financial services landscape (between banks/insurers, but also of new entrants like FinTechs and Telcos), customers are demanding and expecting a more innovative and fluent digital user experience. Unfortunately, most banks and insurers, with their product-oriented online and mobile platforms, are not known for their pleasant and fluent user experience. The trend towards customer oriented services , like personal financial management (with functions like budget management, expense categorization, saving goals…) and robo-advise, is already a big step in the right direction, but even then, managing financials is still considered to be a boring intangible and complex task for most people. Virtual (VR) and augmented reality (AR) could bring a solution. These technologies provide a user experience which is more intuitive, personalised and pleasant , as they introduce an element of gamification to the experience. Both VR and AR

Beyond Imagination: The Rise and Evolution of Generative AI Tools

Generative AI has revolutionized the way we create and interact with digital content. Since the launch of Dall-E in July 2022 and ChatGPT in November 2022, the field has seen unprecedented growth. This technology, initially popularized by OpenAI’s ChatGPT, has now been embraced by major tech players like Microsoft and Google, as well as a plethora of innovative startups. These advancements offer solutions for generating a diverse range of outputs including text, images, video, audio, and other media from simple prompts. The consumer now has a vast array of options based on their specific output needs and use cases . From generic, large-scale, multi-modal models like OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Bard to specialized solutions tailored for specific use cases and sectors like finance and legal advice, the choices are vast and varied. For instance, in the financial sector, tools like BloombergGPT ( https://www.bloomberg.com/ ), FinGPT ( https://fin-gpt.org/ ), StockGPT ( https://www.as

From app to super-app to personal assistant

In July of this year, KBC bank (the 2nd largest bank in Belgium) surprised many people, including many of us working in the banking industry, with their announcement that they bought the rights to broadcast the highlights of soccer matches in Belgium via their mobile app (a service called "Goal alert"). The days following this announcement the news was filled with experts, some of them categorizing it as a brilliant move, others claiming that KBC should better focus on its core mission. Independent of whether it is a good or bad strategic decision (the future will tell), it is clearly part of a much larger strategy of KBC to convert their banking app into a super-app (all-in-one app) . Today you can already buy mobility tickets and cinema tickets and use other third-party services (like Monizze, eBox, PayPal…) within the KBC app. Furthermore, end of last year, KBC announced opening up their app also to non-customers allowing them to also use these third-party servi

Eco-systems - Welcome to a new cooperating world

Last week I attended the Digital Finance Summit conference in Brussels, organized by Fintech Belgium, B-Hive, Febelfin and EBF. A central theme of the summit was the cooperation between banks and Fintechs and more in general the rise of ecosystems. In the past I have written already about this topic in my blogs about "Transforming the bank to an Open API Ecosystem ( https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/transforming-bank-open-api-ecosystem-joris-lochy/ ) and "The war for direct customer contact - Banks should fight along!" ( https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/war-direct-customer-contact-banks-should-fight-along-joris-lochy/ ), but still I was surprised about the number of initiatives taken in this domain. In my last job at The Glue, I already had the pleasure to work on several interesting cases: TOCO ( https://www.toco.eu ): bringing entrepreneurs, accountants and banks closer together, by supporting entrepreneurs and accountants in their daily admin (and in the f

PFM, BFM, Financial Butler, Financial Cockpit, Account Aggregator… - Will the cumbersome administrative tasks on your financials finally be taken over by your financial institution?

1. Introduction Personal Financial Management (PFM) refers to the software that helps users manage their money (budget, save and spend money). Therefore, it is often also called Digital Money Management . In other words, PFM tools help customers make sense of their money , i.e. they help customers follow, classify, remain informed and manage their Personal Finances. Personal Finance used to be (or still is) a time-consuming effort , where people would manually input all their income and expenses in a self-developed spreadsheet, which would gradually be extended with additional calculations. Already for more than 20 years, several software vendors aim to give a solution to this , by providing applications, websites and/or apps. These tools were never massively adopted, since they still required a lot of manual interventions (manual input of income and expense transaction, manual mapping transactions to categories…) and lacked an integration in the day-to-da

Bankloch

Search This Blog