Can financial service incumbents bridge the technology gap?

Worldwide, the evolutions in technology are accelerating exponentially. Almost every day, new technologies are discovered, and new products are released.

This trend will accelerate even more, as:

People all over the world are becoming more educated, allowing more people to participate in the advancement of science and technology
Companies realize more and more that the only way to compete is to innovate. This means that budgets spent on research and innovation increase year over year.
The development of countries like India and China (each with more than 1 billion inhabitants), provide an almost unlimited pool of qualified resources
Several tools support the advancement in R&D, e.g.
- The internet allowing easier sharing of ideas, easier communication, reducing travel time…
- Open-source initiatives: started in the software industry, this new way of collaborating is gradually extended to other domains e.g.
  - Open Compute Project: an open source data center and hardware architecture, launched by Facebook
  - BiOS: in the biotechnology sector
- Cloud Computing: providing almost unlimited computing resources to everyone and avoiding new companies to make large upfront investments in hardware (considerably reducing the cost to launch a new start-up)
- Machine Learning (AI): providing new insights in large datasets, which are impossible for humans to process (due to the sheer volumes).

Keeping track of all those evolutions is almost an impossible task (unless when focusing on a niche), let alone following the pace with implementing these new technologies.
Almost all large companies and especially traditional financial service companies can clearly not follow this pace. Apart from some smaller new players and some smaller (often marketing stunts) projects in larger financial institutions, the dominant technology used to process financial transactions still dates from the 90’s and even those technologies are not fully exploited. For example, even with the technology introduced 20 years ago, banks worldwide should be able to implement real-time international payments. Instead national payments can have delays of more than 24 hours, while simple international payments can take multiple days and cost a fortune in transaction costs.

While financial service companies complain a lot about the increasing compliance and legal restrictions imposed by governments, these regulations actually form the very barrier for large tech companies not to flood the market.
Setting compliance and legal issues aside, companies like Facebook, Google, Apple and Twitter could easily link a current account to their customer accounts and provide real-time instant international payments. The cost of implementation would not be very big, as most technology is present in their system (like authentication, exchanging messages internationally, guaranteeing delivery of those messages…). Instead of sending likes or tweets, the message would represent money.
Luckily for the traditional financial service companies, these protested legal restrictions and different local flavors of the same regulations are prohibiting these large Tech companies of taking this step.
Question however is whether these restrictions can continue to form a high enough barrier.
Initiatives like Bitcoin and Ethereum are already bypassing the existing financial systems and even legislations. Governments all over the world are trying to get a grip on this, but due to the decentral nature of these networks they have a very hard time doing so.

In order to protect their market share, financial service companies urgently need to transform. In the beginning of the internet era, financial service companies were at the forefront of innovation, being one of the first industries providing rich internet applications to their customers. Along the years, almost all financial service companies have lost their innovative character to the (Fin)tech sector.

Young, dynamic IT graduates tend not to choose to work for a bank anymore. If financial service companies want to survive, they need to understand that IT is their core business and therefore treat IT as a key focus area and not as a cost centre, which can be optimized via extensive outsourcing. The CEO of BBVA (Francisco Gonzalez) already understood this 5 years ago (in 2015), when he claimed that BBVA is a software company.

In order to make this transformation, banks need to introduce the practices and methodologies already in place for several years at the large tech companies, i.e.

Organize in small (2-pizza, i.e. 8-10 persons) teams, who can operate independently (freed up from bureaucratic processes). This means that the teams form independent units, independent from large hierarchical structures and several governance boards. These teams should get the freedom to choose their own technology stack and experiment with new technologies.
Decentralize a part of the budget allocations (largest part still needs to be allocated to strategic large-scale initiatives) to these teams, so they can work out themselves small technological and business improvements, which they seem best fit.
Work in a real Agile approach, i.e. gradual incremental delivery of features, instead of the waterfall or semi-Agile approaches currently in place, i.e. most bank executives still steer towards projects with an upfront defined timing and scope.
Introduce DevOps principles, i.e. the above small teams should have the liberty to deliver regularly to production and be responsible for the operation of their deliveries
Implement a micro-services architecture, allowing easy replacement of parts of a solution and facilitating the independence of the small teams

If incumbent banks can implement only a part of those actions, competition from Fintech neo-banks will be negligible. The existing customer base, extensive expertise in banking and risk management, local and personal touch, full product scope and scale-advantages of most large incumbent banks gives them enormous competitive advantages over neo-banks. Tech can give fun additional features, but for most people trust in the safety of their money is still the most important decision factor of where to deposit their money.

Comments

Transforming the insurance sector to an Open API Ecosystem

1. Introduction "Open" has recently become a new buzzword in the financial services industry, i.e. open data, open APIs, Open Banking, Open Insurance …, but what does this new buzzword really mean? "Open" refers to the capability of companies to expose their services to the outside world, so that external partners or even competitors can use these services to bring added value to their customers. This trend is made possible by the technological evolution of open APIs (Application Programming Interfaces), which are the digital ports making this communication possible. Together companies, interconnected through open APIs, form a true API ecosystem , offering best-of-breed customer experience, by combining the digital services offered by multiple companies. In the technology sector this evolution has been ongoing for multiple years (think about the travelling sector, allowing you to book any hotel online). An excellent example of this

Are product silos in a bank inevitable?

Silo thinking is often frowned upon in the industry. It is often a synonym for bureaucratic processes and politics and in almost every article describing the threats of new innovative Fintech players on the banking industry, the strong bank product silos are put forward as one of the main blockages why incumbent banks are not able to (quickly) react to the changing customer expectations. Customers want solutions to their problems and do not want to be bothered about the internal organisation of their bank. Most banks are however organized by product domain (daily banking, investments and lending) and by customer segmentation (retail banking, private banking, SMEs and corporates). This division is reflected both at business and IT side and almost automatically leads to the creation of silos. It is however difficult to reorganize a bank without creating new silos or introducing other types of issues and inefficiencies. An organization is never ideal and needs to take a number of cons

RPA - The miracle solution for incumbent banks to bridge the automation gap with neo-banks?

Hypes and marketing buzz words are strongly present in the IT landscape. Often these are existing concepts, which have evolved technologically and are then renamed to a new term, as if it were a brand new technology or concept. If you want to understand and assess these new trends, it is important to reduce the concepts to their essence and compare them with existing technologies , e.g. Integration (middleware) software ensures that 2 separate applications or components can be integrated in an easy way. Of course, there is a huge evolution in the protocols, volumes of exchanged data, scalability, performance…, but in essence the problem remains the same. Nonetheless, there have been multiple terms for integration software such as ETL, ESB, EAI, SOA, Service Mesh… Data storage software ensures that data is stored in such a way that data is not lost and that there is some kind guaranteed consistency, maximum availability and scalability, easy retrieval and searching

IoT - Revolution or Evolution in the Financial Services Industry

1. The IoT hype We have all heard about the "Internet of Things" (IoT) as this revolutionary new technology, which will radically change our lives. But is it really such a revolution and will it really have an impact on the Financial Services Industry? To refresh our memory, the Internet of Things (IoT) refers to any object , which is able to collect data and communicate and share this information (like condition, geolocation…) over the internet . This communication will often occur between 2 objects (i.e. not involving any human), which is often referred to as Machine-to-Machine (M2M) communication. Well known examples are home thermostats, home security systems, fitness and health monitors, wearables… This all seems futuristic, but smartphones, tablets and smartwatches can also be considered as IoT devices. More importantly, beside these futuristic visions of IoT, the smartphone will most likely continue to be the center of the connected devi

PSD3: The Next Phase in Europe’s Payment Services Regulation

With the successful rollout of PSD2, the European Union (EU) continues to advance innovation in the payments domain through the anticipated introduction of the Payment Services Directive 3 (PSD3) . On June 28, 2023, the European Commission published a draft proposal for PSD3 and the Payment Services Regulation (PSR) . The finalized versions of this directive and associated regulation are expected to be available by late 2024, although some predictions suggest a more likely timeline of Q2 or Q3 2025. Given that member states are typically granted an 18-month transition period, PSD3 is expected to come into effect sometime in 2026. Notably, the Commission has introduced a regulation (PSR) alongside the PSD3 directive, ensuring more harmonization across member states as regulations are immediately effective and do not require national implementation, unlike directives. PSD3 shares the same objectives as PSD2, i.e. increasing competition in the payments landscape and enhancing consum

Trade-offs Are Inevitable in Software Delivery - Remember the CAP Theorem

In the world of financial services, the integrity of data systems is fundamentally reliant on non-functional requirements (NFRs) such as reliability and security. Despite their importance, NFRs often receive secondary consideration during project scoping, typically being reduced to a generic checklist aimed more at compliance than at genuine functionality. Regrettably, these initial NFRs are seldom met after delivery, which does not usually prevent deployment to production due to the vague and unrealistic nature of the original specifications. This common scenario results in significant end-user frustration as the system does not perform as expected, often being less stable or slower than anticipated. This situation underscores the need for better education on how to articulate and define NFRs , i.e. demanding only what is truly necessary and feasible within the given budget. Early and transparent discussions can lead to system architecture being tailored more closely to realisti

Low- and No-code platforms - Will IT developers soon be out of a job?

“ The future of coding is no coding at all ” - Chris Wanstrath (CEO at GitHub). Mid May I posted a blog on RPA (Robotic Process Automation - https://bankloch.blogspot.com/2020/05/rpa-miracle-solution-for-incumbent.html ) on how this technology, promises the world to companies. A very similar story is found with low- and no-code platforms, which also promise that business people, with limited to no knowledge of IT, can create complex business applications. These platforms originate , just as RPA tools, from the growing demand for IT developments , while IT cannot keep up with the available capacity. As a result, an enormous gap between IT teams and business demands is created, which is often filled by shadow-IT departments, which extend the IT workforce and create business tools in Excel, Access, WordPress… Unfortunately these tools built in shadow-IT departments arrive very soon at their limits, as they don’t support the required non-functional requirements (like high availabili

An overview of 1-year blogging

Last week I published my 60th post on my blog called Bankloch (a reference to "Banking" and my family name). The past year, I have published a blog on a weekly basis, providing my humble personal vision on the topics of Fintech, IT software delivery and mobility. This blogging has mainly been a personal enrichment , as it forced me to dive deep into a number of different topics, not only in researching for content, but also in trying to identify trends, innovations and patterns into these topics. Furthermore it allowed me to have several very interesting conversations and discussions with passionate colleagues in the financial industry and to get more insights into the wonderful world of blogging and more general of digital marketing, exploring subjects and tools like: Search Engine Optimization (SEO) LinkedIn post optimization Google Search Console Google AdWorks Google Blogger Thinker360 Finextra … Clearly it is not easy to get the necessary attention . With th

Deals as a competitive differentiator in the financial sector

In my blog " Customer acquisition cost: probably the most valuable metric for Fintechs " ( https://bankloch.blogspot.com/2020/06/customer-acquisition-cost-probably-most.html ) I described how a customer acquisition strategy can make or break a Fintech. In the traditional Retail sector, focused on selling different types of products for personal usage to end-customers, customer acquisition is just as important. No wonder that the advertisement sector is a multi-billion dollar industry. However in recent years due to the digitalization and consequently the rise of Digital Marketing , customer acquisition has become much more focused on delivering the right message via the right channel to the right person on the right time . Big tech players like Google and Facebook are specialized in this kind of targeted marketing, which is a key factor for their success and multi-billion valuations. Their exponential growth in marketing revenues seems however coming to a halt, as digi

AI in Financial Services - A buzzword that is here to stay!

In a few of my most recent blogs I tried to demystify some of the buzzwords (like blockchain, Low- and No-Code platforms, RPA…), which are commonly used in the financial services industry. These buzzwords often entail interesting innovations, but contrary to their promise, they are not silver bullets solving any problem. Another such buzzword is AI (or also referred to as Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Enforced Learning… - the difference between those terms put aside). Again this term is also seriously hyped, creating unrealistic expectations, but contrary to many other buzzwords, this is something I truly believe will have a much larger impact on the financial services industry than many other buzzwords. This opinion is backed by a study of McKinsey and PWC indicating that 72% of company leaders consider that AI will be the most competitive advantage of the future and that this technology will be the most disruptive force in the decades to come. Deep Learning (= DL) is a s

Bankloch

Search This Blog