Skip to main content

What is more excessive: regularly taking taxis or possessing your own car?


In Belgium owning a car is still something to aspire. A symbol of freedom to go where you want, whenever you want.
The generation of the millennials seems however to make a shift. Often living in the (large) cities, they prefer to make use of the different available public and sharing mobility options (public transport, ride/car sharing, bike/step/scooter sharing…​). A whole mobility eco-system is rising around this evolution:
  • Route planners taking into account these alternative ways of transportation: e.g. Skipr or Jeasy
  • (e)Bike, (e)Step and Scooter sharing services:
    • (e)Bike: Jump, Villo!, Billy Bike, Blue-bike, Fietspunt, Velo, Cloudbike, Spinlister
    • (e)Scooter: Scooty, Felyx
    • (e)Step: Dott, Lime, Troty, Bird, Circ, Poppy
  • Car rental: Sixt, Rentalcars.com, AutoEurope, Avis, Rent A Car…​
  • Car sharing: Cambio, Partago, Zipcar, Poppy, stapp.in, CozyCar…​
  • Car pooling: Taxistop, Eventpool, Karzoo, BlaBlaCar, Toogethr
  • …​
While these are good alternatives for short distances and for people living in the large cities, they are not very practical for people living outside the large cities. The same people now using these alternative means of transport are often still trading in their city apartment for a house in the suburbs or countryside, once they get children. It is important to avoid that these people will be reconverted to traditional patterns of mobility at that moment.
One possible alternative to owning a car could be taxi. Taking a taxi is still considered in Belgium as luxury and excessive. Indeed, taxis are (considered) expensive in Belgium, but are they really that expensive? People have a tendency to consider a product or service for which they pay a fixed, direct amount as more expensive, compared to a product or service, with a lot of indirect costs or with recurring flows of smaller amounts (hence the evolution of buying everything via a subscription model).
I was wondering therefore as of which point it would be more interesting to always drive around in a taxi. Below I made a quick calculation (for Belgium):
What is the price of a taxi?
Prices differ between different taxi companies and in different cities, but on average you could say a customer pays around 2.50 EUR initial fee and 2.20 EUR per kilometer.
What is the price of owning a car?
Typically, a calculation of 0.33 EUR per kilometer is used.
More in detail you can consider, below simulation:
  • Acquisition of a car : 17 500 euro.
  • Price of the license plate: 30 EUR
  • Car entry tax: 150 EUR
  • Traffic tax: 250 EUR / year
  • Car insurance: 400 EUR / year (note that this is not for an omnium insurance and for young people, this can be considerably more)
  • Gas : 1.5 EUR / liter with a typical consumption of 5 liter / 100 km, gives 0.075 EUR / km
  • Small maintenance car: 200 EUR
  • Major maintenance car: 600 EUR
  • Tires: 500 EUR for replacement of all tires (to be done every 45.0000 km)
  • Vehicle inspection: 40 EUR
If we consider a write-off on 8 years this results in following figures:
  • Acquisition of a car : 182 EUR / month
  • Taxes and license plate: 23 EUR / month
  • Insurance: 33 EUR / month
  • Maintenance: 38 EUR / month
  • Vehicle inspection: 1 EUR / month
which gives a fixed cost of 277 EUR / month without fuel.
Note that this excludes the residual value of the car (after 8 years) and following (potential) costs:
  • Interest payments for car loan
  • Parking payments
  • Winter tires
  • Car wash
  • Repair costs following accident(s)
  • Traffic fines
Now that we have calculated the costs of these 2 means of transportation, let’s do some simulations:
Scenario 1: Person does 1 trip a day to somewhere, on average about 10 km in distance (so 20 km in total back and forth):
  • Car:
    • Gas: 30 days / month * 20 km / day * 0.075 EUR / km = 45 EUR gas / month
    • Fixed cost: 277 EUR / month
    • Total: 322 EUR / month
  • Taxi:
    • Initial fee: 30 days / month * 2 trips / day (back and forth) * 2,50 EUR = 150 EUR / month
    • Km fee: 30 days / month * 20 km / day * 2,20 EUR / km = 1.320 EUR / month
    • Total: 1.470 EUR / month
Clearly in this scenario, a taxi is not an option.
Scenario 2: Person does 2 trips a week to somewhere, on average about 10 km in distance (so 20 km in total back and forth):
  • Car:
    • Gas: 4 weeks / month * 40 km / week * 0.075 EUR / km = 12 EUR gas / month
    • Fixed cost: 277 EUR / month
    • Total: 289 EUR / month
  • Taxi:
    • Initial fee: 4 weeks / month * 2 trips / week (back and forth) * 2,50 EUR = 40 EUR / month
    • Km fee: 4 weeks / month * 40 km / week * 2,20 EUR / km = 352 EUR / month
    • Total: 392 EUR / month
In this scenario, the taxi is still more expensive, but difference is not that big anymore, especially when considering all costs which were excluded (see above) and the advantages of a taxi, i.e.
  • No parking issues
  • Possibility to consume alcohol
  • Possibility to relax or do other things during the drive around
  • Transform CapEx to OpEx, i.e. avoid fixed costs, but instead pay only for actual usage
The above scenario shows it can be interesting for people consuming their car very little to use always a taxi instead. Especially for elderly people, for which driving can give a lot of stress and for which parking far from their destination is problematic, this can be a valuable alternative. At the same time, the scenario shows that the taxi is depassing already the cost of a car only with a few rides a month.
In order to make this really a valuable alternative, the sector should modernize and explore new options, like:
  • Embrace more initiatives like Uber, Lyft and Bolt (European challenger of Uber), but adapted to the Belgian market, i.e. working with professional taxi drivers. Such platforms make the whole taxi process much more user friendly, which can result in more demand (and thus less taxis not driving around with customers).
    A platform like Uber can give a lot of advantages to customer and taxi driver:
    • Easier calling a taxi (fully online, automatic selection of closest taxi, based on mobile location and estimation of time for taxi to arrive)
    • Get notified when taxi is at your location and get immediately info about driver
    • Automatic communication of destination to driver
    • Automatic estimation of price for the ride and time to destination
    • Automatic online payment
    • Possibility to review and score driver, allowing immediate feedback and improving quality
    • Platform can predict places where people will be calling for taxis, allowing taxi drivers to drive there (allowing to increase revenues for taxi driver and reduce waiting times for customers)
  • Subsidize taxis, with taxi vouchers. Many cities in Belgium already offer taxi vouchers to inhabitants with a mobility restriction. The system has however a lot of restrictions, not very known and still paper-based (making the user experience not very fluent).
  • Allow sharing a taxi (with strangers) via a platform, allowing to divide the price
  • Mini vans making fixed tours, but also visible and reservable via platform (at lower rates), providing an easy alternative for Public transport
Platforms like taxi.eu and eCab try to setup such an alternative to Uber, but with professional taxi companies. It will be interesting to see if such platforms can modernize the taxi sector and lead to better customer service and lower prices. If so, the taxi can be a real alternative to owning your own car (if you use your car very little).
But all this is just an intermediate step towards the self-driving cars. This will completely revolutionize our mobility, as cars rented as a service will be available to anyone (also those living at the countryside), at relatively low costs and providing all above-mentioned advantages of a taxi.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Transforming the insurance sector to an Open API Ecosystem

1. Introduction "Open" has recently become a new buzzword in the financial services industry, i.e.   open data, open APIs, Open Banking, Open Insurance …​, but what does this new buzzword really mean? "Open" refers to the capability of companies to expose their services to the outside world, so that   external partners or even competitors   can use these services to bring added value to their customers. This trend is made possible by the technological evolution of   open APIs (Application Programming Interfaces), which are the   digital ports making this communication possible. Together companies, interconnected through open APIs, form a true   API ecosystem , offering best-of-breed customer experience, by combining the digital services offered by multiple companies. In the   technology sector   this evolution has been ongoing for multiple years (think about the travelling sector, allowing you to book any hotel online). An excellent example of this

Are product silos in a bank inevitable?

Silo thinking   is often frowned upon in the industry. It is often a synonym for bureaucratic processes and politics and in almost every article describing the threats of new innovative Fintech players on the banking industry, the strong bank product silos are put forward as one of the main blockages why incumbent banks are not able to (quickly) react to the changing customer expectations. Customers want solutions to their problems   and do not want to be bothered about the internal organisation of their bank. Most banks are however organized by product domain (daily banking, investments and lending) and by customer segmentation (retail banking, private banking, SMEs and corporates). This division is reflected both at business and IT side and almost automatically leads to the creation of silos. It is however difficult to reorganize a bank without creating new silos or introducing other types of issues and inefficiencies. An organization is never ideal and needs to take a number of cons

RPA - The miracle solution for incumbent banks to bridge the automation gap with neo-banks?

Hypes and marketing buzz words are strongly present in the IT landscape. Often these are existing concepts, which have evolved technologically and are then renamed to a new term, as if it were a brand new technology or concept. If you want to understand and assess these new trends, it is important to   reduce the concepts to their essence and compare them with existing technologies , e.g. Integration (middleware) software   ensures that 2 separate applications or components can be integrated in an easy way. Of course, there is a huge evolution in the protocols, volumes of exchanged data, scalability, performance…​, but in essence the problem remains the same. Nonetheless, there have been multiple terms for integration software such as ETL, ESB, EAI, SOA, Service Mesh…​ Data storage software   ensures that data is stored in such a way that data is not lost and that there is some kind guaranteed consistency, maximum availability and scalability, easy retrieval and searching

IoT - Revolution or Evolution in the Financial Services Industry

1. The IoT hype We have all heard about the   "Internet of Things" (IoT)   as this revolutionary new technology, which will radically change our lives. But is it really such a revolution and will it really have an impact on the Financial Services Industry? To refresh our memory, the Internet of Things (IoT) refers to any   object , which is able to   collect data and communicate and share this information (like condition, geolocation…​)   over the internet . This communication will often occur between 2 objects (i.e. not involving any human), which is often referred to as Machine-to-Machine (M2M) communication. Well known examples are home thermostats, home security systems, fitness and health monitors, wearables…​ This all seems futuristic, but   smartphones, tablets and smartwatches   can also be considered as IoT devices. More importantly, beside these futuristic visions of IoT, the smartphone will most likely continue to be the center of the connected devi

PSD3: The Next Phase in Europe’s Payment Services Regulation

With the successful rollout of PSD2, the European Union (EU) continues to advance innovation in the payments domain through the anticipated introduction of the   Payment Services Directive 3 (PSD3) . On June 28, 2023, the European Commission published a draft proposal for PSD3 and the   Payment Services Regulation (PSR) . The finalized versions of this directive and associated regulation are expected to be available by late 2024, although some predictions suggest a more likely timeline of Q2 or Q3 2025. Given that member states are typically granted an 18-month transition period, PSD3 is expected to come into effect sometime in 2026. Notably, the Commission has introduced a regulation (PSR) alongside the PSD3 directive, ensuring more harmonization across member states as regulations are immediately effective and do not require national implementation, unlike directives. PSD3 shares the same objectives as PSD2, i.e.   increasing competition in the payments landscape and enhancing consum

Trade-offs Are Inevitable in Software Delivery - Remember the CAP Theorem

In the world of financial services, the integrity of data systems is fundamentally reliant on   non-functional requirements (NFRs)   such as reliability and security. Despite their importance, NFRs often receive secondary consideration during project scoping, typically being reduced to a generic checklist aimed more at compliance than at genuine functionality. Regrettably, these initial NFRs are seldom met after delivery, which does not usually prevent deployment to production due to the vague and unrealistic nature of the original specifications. This common scenario results in significant end-user frustration as the system does not perform as expected, often being less stable or slower than anticipated. This situation underscores the need for   better education on how to articulate and define NFRs , i.e. demanding only what is truly necessary and feasible within the given budget. Early and transparent discussions can lead to system architecture being tailored more closely to realisti

Low- and No-code platforms - Will IT developers soon be out of a job?

“ The future of coding is no coding at all ” - Chris Wanstrath (CEO at GitHub). Mid May I posted a blog on RPA (Robotic Process Automation -   https://bankloch.blogspot.com/2020/05/rpa-miracle-solution-for-incumbent.html ) on how this technology, promises the world to companies. A very similar story is found with low- and no-code platforms, which also promise that business people, with limited to no knowledge of IT, can create complex business applications. These   platforms originate , just as RPA tools,   from the growing demand for IT developments , while IT cannot keep up with the available capacity. As a result, an enormous gap between IT teams and business demands is created, which is often filled by shadow-IT departments, which extend the IT workforce and create business tools in Excel, Access, WordPress…​ Unfortunately these tools built in shadow-IT departments arrive very soon at their limits, as they don’t support the required non-functional requirements (like high availabili

An overview of 1-year blogging

Last week I published my   60th post   on my blog called   Bankloch   (a reference to "Banking" and my family name). The past year, I have published a blog on a weekly basis, providing my humble personal vision on the topics of Fintech, IT software delivery and mobility. This blogging has mainly been a   personal enrichment , as it forced me to dive deep into a number of different topics, not only in researching for content, but also in trying to identify trends, innovations and patterns into these topics. Furthermore it allowed me to have several very interesting conversations and discussions with passionate colleagues in the financial industry and to get more insights into the wonderful world of blogging and more general of digital marketing, exploring subjects and tools like: Search Engine Optimization (SEO) LinkedIn post optimization Google Search Console Google AdWorks Google Blogger Thinker360 Finextra …​ Clearly it is   not easy to get the necessary attention . With th

Deals as a competitive differentiator in the financial sector

In my blog " Customer acquisition cost: probably the most valuable metric for Fintechs " ( https://bankloch.blogspot.com/2020/06/customer-acquisition-cost-probably-most.html ) I described how a customer acquisition strategy can make or break a Fintech. In the traditional Retail sector, focused on selling different types of products for personal usage to end-customers,   customer acquisition  is just as important. No wonder that the advertisement sector is a multi-billion dollar industry. However in recent years due to the digitalization and consequently the rise of   Digital Marketing , customer acquisition has become much more focused on   delivering the right message via the right channel to the right person on the right time . Big tech players like Google and Facebook are specialized in this kind of targeted marketing, which is a key factor for their success and multi-billion valuations. Their exponential growth in marketing revenues seems however coming to a halt, as digi

AI in Financial Services - A buzzword that is here to stay!

In a few of my most recent blogs I tried to   demystify some of the buzzwords   (like blockchain, Low- and No-Code platforms, RPA…​), which are commonly used in the financial services industry. These buzzwords often entail interesting innovations, but contrary to their promise, they are not silver bullets solving any problem. Another such buzzword is   AI   (or also referred to as Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Enforced Learning…​ - the difference between those terms put aside). Again this term is also seriously hyped, creating unrealistic expectations, but contrary to many other buzzwords, this is something I truly believe will have a much larger impact on the financial services industry than many other buzzwords. This opinion is backed by a study of McKinsey and PWC indicating that 72% of company leaders consider that AI will be the most competitive advantage of the future and that this technology will be the most disruptive force in the decades to come. Deep Learning (= DL) is a s