Skip to main content

A good business plan is the foundation of every new idea


Having a true "blue" (introvert and analytical) personality type, I often feel envy towards charismatic (often extravert) entrepreneurs and more specifically the ease with which they can setup new businesses and coordinate different activities.

At the same time, it amazes me how many of those successful entrepreneurs have poor skills in financial management and have no clue how to build even a basic business plan.
Maybe this is also the reason of their success, as they manage mainly from their gut-feeling and act before analyzing everything.
Obviously this tactic has its limits, as when attracting investors or when scaling, some kind of business plan will be required as a common guideline to work towards.

Having worked years as a consultant and working now as an Innovation and Product manager, I can honestly say I have seen my fair share of (financial) business plans.
Obviously you can make a financial business plan as simple or as complex as you want. However given that such a plan is based on a lot of assumptions (for quantifying the unknowns and the future) and needs to be easily explainable (e.g. to colleagues, investors…​) and maintainable (a business plan should not be a static document), my suggestion is not to over complexify it. Better to foresee some contingency on the figures than to try estimating all possible (secondary) revenues and costs.
Nonetheless a business plan of a new business, project or new product/service should contain some minimum elements, i.e. every business plan consists of 2 parts:

  • First there is the projection (over the new X years) of the expected costs. This consists of the one-time (investments) costs (like e.g. the implementation of the software) and the recurring costs (like the hardware cost, the maintenance cost, the support cost…​). When looking at these costs, it is interesting to have a list of the typical cost categories (like marketing, sales, helpdesk, hardware, …​) you might have. This can give a guideline not to forget any fundamental costs, as people tend to underestimate all the costs that come with a new business/product.

  • Second there are the benefits, which typically comes down to the (increase in) profit generated by the initiative. Often those are split in qualitative and quantitative benefits. Qualitative benefits (like increased brand recognition, improved customer service, improved data quality…​) ultimately result also in higher revenues, but as they often have dependencies on other factors and do not have a direct impact on the revenues, it is almost impossible to quantify them and therefore they are just listed (and described).
    The quantitative benefits can be split in 3 categories, i.e. increase of revenues (e.g. more sales, higher price…​), decrease of costs(e.g. by lowering the number of FTEs via automation) and decrease of risks. These risks can also be quantified by multiplying the probability of the risk occurring with the cost when a risk produces itself and then calculating the delta resulting from the initiative.

Once you have described all your costs and benefits over time, you can calculate the return on investment. Different techniques exist here, all or not taking into account the cost of capital, e.g. the ROI (on 3y, on 5y…​), the IRR or the payback period. These KPIs allow to compare multiple initiatives in a uniform way and select the most profitable one.

This sounds very simple, but making a good business plan feels sometimes more like an art than science, but there are some guidelines and key lessons to take into account:

  • Understand well what the basic process is to generate profit, i.e. if we make it very simple, you first start with generating leads via marketing campaigns. The better the campaign the more leads you get. Afterwards those leads need to be converted into actual customers by good salespeople, a fluent onboarding process, a good follow-up…​ Once a customer is onboarded, you need to generate profit out of this customer. Typically this will depend on the number of transactions the customer does, the average value per transaction and the margin on each transaction. All those factors can be improved, via targeted campaigns, correct price setting, up- and cross-selling, decreasing cost via automation…​ A good business plan should reflect on every step of this process and how the initiative will positively or negatively impact each step.

  • Not every profitable idea should be executed, i.e. even if a business case is very positive, it is important to reflect whether it fits your company values and strategy. Otherwise the short-term gain achieved by the idea will likely have a serious negative impact on the long-term. Furthermore your capacity to execute is limited, meaning you will need to pick the right project to execute (i.e. a plan with a good ROI, but also with a strategic fit and in domain where you have sufficient knowledge and credibility in).

  • In a business plan, it is not only important to make your own business case, but also the one of your customers. Obviously if a customer is buying something from you, he will also make a trade-off (business case) of his costs vs. benefits. If this business case is not sufficiently positive for him, it is unlikely sales will happen and/or continue to flourish in the long-term.

  • Take the effort to document your business plan well and to make it flexible (often via a good Excel file, with easy adaptable parameters). It is unlikely your business plan will be accepted from the first time, so the effort you put in initially to structure your plan well, will allow you to make quick adaptations after feedback, meaning this initial time will be largely regained afterwards. Furthermore a business plan should not be a static document and should over time be revisited regularly, meaning that even when your initiative is launched, you should still regularly work on (and adapt) this business plan.

  • Do not lose yourself in the numbers. When you start creating a business plan, often you tend to lose yourself in a mathematical, theoretical exercise, where the different numbers have become abstract concepts. As such, after you have created your business plan, it is important to verify if every figure is realistic. E.g. you could say that you will sell to 1% of the Belgian population. This assumption in itself seems feasible, but when you then reflect on the derived figure that these are 110.000 customers to sell to, it will probably not seem so straight forward anymore. Often the absolute values derived from a percentage will give you different insights than just the percentage.
    It is therefore a good idea to clearly show all intermediate results separately in your business plan. These intermediate results (if they have a meaning) can often give new insights about the feasibility of your business plan.

  • Document your assumptions: your business plan tries to predict the future, something nobody really can. As such it is important to write down your assumptions, so you can regularly review them to see if they are still valid. If an assumption is no longer valid, it means you need to update your business plan. If for some reason, due to the changing assumption, the business plan is no longer positive, you should stop, independent of how much investment has already been done. This might seem very contra-intuitive but spent costs in the past should have no impact on your current business plan and business decisions.

  • Do not calculate yourself rich. In the book of Jurgen Ingels ("50 lessen voor een ondernemer"), he mentions he always applies as an investor following rules on each business plan: revenues are always generated slower and are always less, i.e. as a rule of thumb he uses that revenues are generated 2 quarters later than planned and are 25% less than estimated. And the costs are always higher, so he adds 30% to the estimated costs.
    This anecdote shows that every entrepreneur is by nature too optimistic, which logically rises from their strong belief in their business idea.

  • Do not calculate business plans for more than 5 years. In a continuously changing world, the next year is already difficult to predict, let alone 5 years. Everything after 5 years is purely hypothetical. Often business plans are made for a period longer than 5 years to make the case more positive, i.e. obviously an ROI on 10 years will be better than the one of 5 years. However if you need such long-time horizons for making your business plan sufficiently positive, there is likely something fundamentally wrong with the business initiative.

  • The rest of the world is also moving¨. If you have a brilliant new idea today and go to market with it, it is unlikely there will not be competitors in a few years. The same is also true for less innovative initiatives, i.e. the market will always react to an initiative you take. This means you might have to foresee stagnating revenues after e.g. 3 years when the competition has caught up on that initiative.

  • Do not ignore the cash flows. Even if you have a positive business case, you still need to validate if you have sufficient cash (liquidity) at any moment in time. Often business ideas require a lot of upfront investment, which means you need cash to pay for those costs, in anticipation of the future revenues. Obviously, you need to ensure you can cross that time path without going bankrupt, as otherwise you will never reap the fruits of your investments.

These are of course just a few lessons, but I hope it might give some inspiration.
Would however love to hear your insights, lessons learned and best practices in building your business plans. If you have interesting elements to add, feel free to share them. Maybe those can lead to a sequel of this blog article.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Transforming the insurance sector to an Open API Ecosystem

1. Introduction "Open" has recently become a new buzzword in the financial services industry, i.e.   open data, open APIs, Open Banking, Open Insurance …​, but what does this new buzzword really mean? "Open" refers to the capability of companies to expose their services to the outside world, so that   external partners or even competitors   can use these services to bring added value to their customers. This trend is made possible by the technological evolution of   open APIs (Application Programming Interfaces), which are the   digital ports making this communication possible. Together companies, interconnected through open APIs, form a true   API ecosystem , offering best-of-breed customer experience, by combining the digital services offered by multiple companies. In the   technology sector   this evolution has been ongoing for multiple years (think about the travelling sector, allowing you to book any hotel online). An excellent example of this

Are product silos in a bank inevitable?

Silo thinking   is often frowned upon in the industry. It is often a synonym for bureaucratic processes and politics and in almost every article describing the threats of new innovative Fintech players on the banking industry, the strong bank product silos are put forward as one of the main blockages why incumbent banks are not able to (quickly) react to the changing customer expectations. Customers want solutions to their problems   and do not want to be bothered about the internal organisation of their bank. Most banks are however organized by product domain (daily banking, investments and lending) and by customer segmentation (retail banking, private banking, SMEs and corporates). This division is reflected both at business and IT side and almost automatically leads to the creation of silos. It is however difficult to reorganize a bank without creating new silos or introducing other types of issues and inefficiencies. An organization is never ideal and needs to take a number of cons

RPA - The miracle solution for incumbent banks to bridge the automation gap with neo-banks?

Hypes and marketing buzz words are strongly present in the IT landscape. Often these are existing concepts, which have evolved technologically and are then renamed to a new term, as if it were a brand new technology or concept. If you want to understand and assess these new trends, it is important to   reduce the concepts to their essence and compare them with existing technologies , e.g. Integration (middleware) software   ensures that 2 separate applications or components can be integrated in an easy way. Of course, there is a huge evolution in the protocols, volumes of exchanged data, scalability, performance…​, but in essence the problem remains the same. Nonetheless, there have been multiple terms for integration software such as ETL, ESB, EAI, SOA, Service Mesh…​ Data storage software   ensures that data is stored in such a way that data is not lost and that there is some kind guaranteed consistency, maximum availability and scalability, easy retrieval and searching

IoT - Revolution or Evolution in the Financial Services Industry

1. The IoT hype We have all heard about the   "Internet of Things" (IoT)   as this revolutionary new technology, which will radically change our lives. But is it really such a revolution and will it really have an impact on the Financial Services Industry? To refresh our memory, the Internet of Things (IoT) refers to any   object , which is able to   collect data and communicate and share this information (like condition, geolocation…​)   over the internet . This communication will often occur between 2 objects (i.e. not involving any human), which is often referred to as Machine-to-Machine (M2M) communication. Well known examples are home thermostats, home security systems, fitness and health monitors, wearables…​ This all seems futuristic, but   smartphones, tablets and smartwatches   can also be considered as IoT devices. More importantly, beside these futuristic visions of IoT, the smartphone will most likely continue to be the center of the connected devi

Neobanks should find their niche to improve their profitability

The last 5 years dozens of so-called   neo- or challenger banks  (according to Exton Consulting 256 neobanks are in circulation today) have disrupted the banking landscape, by offering a fully digitized (cfr. "tech companies with a banking license"), very customer-centric, simple and fluent (e.g. possibility to become client and open an account in a few clicks) and low-cost product and service offering. While several of them are already valued at billions of euros (like Revolut, Monzo, Chime, N26, NuBank…​), very few of them are expected to be profitable in the coming years and even less are already profitable today (Accenture research shows that the average UK neobank loses $11 per user yearly). These challenger banks are typically confronted with increasing costs, while the margins generated per customer remain low (e.g. due to the offering of free products and services or above market-level saving account interest rates). While it’s obvious that disrupting the financial ma

Beyond Imagination: The Rise and Evolution of Generative AI Tools

Generative AI   has revolutionized the way we create and interact with digital content. Since the launch of Dall-E in July 2022 and ChatGPT in November 2022, the field has seen unprecedented growth. This technology, initially popularized by OpenAI’s ChatGPT, has now been embraced by major tech players like Microsoft and Google, as well as a plethora of innovative startups. These advancements offer solutions for generating a diverse range of outputs including text, images, video, audio, and other media from simple prompts. The consumer now has a vast array of options based on their specific   output needs and use cases . From generic, large-scale, multi-modal models like OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Bard to specialized solutions tailored for specific use cases and sectors like finance and legal advice, the choices are vast and varied. For instance, in the financial sector, tools like BloombergGPT ( https://www.bloomberg.com/ ), FinGPT ( https://fin-gpt.org/ ), StockGPT ( https://www.as

Can Augmented Reality make daily banking a more pleasant experience?

With the   increased competition in the financial services landscape (between banks/insurers, but also of new entrants like FinTechs and Telcos), customers are demanding and expecting a more innovative and fluent digital user experience. Unfortunately, most banks and insurers, with their product-oriented online and mobile platforms, are not known for their pleasant and fluent user experience. The   trend towards customer oriented services , like personal financial management (with functions like budget management, expense categorization, saving goals…​) and robo-advise, is already a big step in the right direction, but even then, managing financials is still considered to be a boring intangible and complex task for most people. Virtual (VR) and augmented reality (AR)   could bring a solution. These technologies provide a user experience which is   more intuitive, personalised and pleasant , as they introduce an element of   gamification   to the experience. Both VR and AR

PFM, BFM, Financial Butler, Financial Cockpit, Account Aggregator…​ - Will the cumbersome administrative tasks on your financials finally be taken over by your financial institution?

1. Introduction Personal Financial Management   (PFM) refers to the software that helps users manage their money (budget, save and spend money). Therefore, it is often also called   Digital Money Management . In other words, PFM tools   help customers make sense of their money , i.e. they help customers follow, classify, remain informed and manage their Personal Finances. Personal Finance   used to be (or still is) a time-consuming effort , where people would manually input all their income and expenses in a self-developed spreadsheet, which would gradually be extended with additional calculations. Already for more than 20 years,   several software vendors aim to give a solution to this , by providing applications, websites and/or apps. These tools were never massively adopted, since they still required a lot of manual interventions (manual input of income and expense transaction, manual mapping transactions to categories…​) and lacked an integration in the day-to-da

Deals as a competitive differentiator in the financial sector

In my blog " Customer acquisition cost: probably the most valuable metric for Fintechs " ( https://bankloch.blogspot.com/2020/06/customer-acquisition-cost-probably-most.html ) I described how a customer acquisition strategy can make or break a Fintech. In the traditional Retail sector, focused on selling different types of products for personal usage to end-customers,   customer acquisition  is just as important. No wonder that the advertisement sector is a multi-billion dollar industry. However in recent years due to the digitalization and consequently the rise of   Digital Marketing , customer acquisition has become much more focused on   delivering the right message via the right channel to the right person on the right time . Big tech players like Google and Facebook are specialized in this kind of targeted marketing, which is a key factor for their success and multi-billion valuations. Their exponential growth in marketing revenues seems however coming to a halt, as digi

Low- and No-code platforms - Will IT developers soon be out of a job?

“ The future of coding is no coding at all ” - Chris Wanstrath (CEO at GitHub). Mid May I posted a blog on RPA (Robotic Process Automation -   https://bankloch.blogspot.com/2020/05/rpa-miracle-solution-for-incumbent.html ) on how this technology, promises the world to companies. A very similar story is found with low- and no-code platforms, which also promise that business people, with limited to no knowledge of IT, can create complex business applications. These   platforms originate , just as RPA tools,   from the growing demand for IT developments , while IT cannot keep up with the available capacity. As a result, an enormous gap between IT teams and business demands is created, which is often filled by shadow-IT departments, which extend the IT workforce and create business tools in Excel, Access, WordPress…​ Unfortunately these tools built in shadow-IT departments arrive very soon at their limits, as they don’t support the required non-functional requirements (like high availabili