Skip to main content

Bring order to the Fintech chaos


The word "Fintech" has become such a hype and such a widely used term, that it can actually mean anything today. Therefore when people ask for trends in the Fintech industry, this becomes harder and harder to answer, as anything even remotely associated with financial services can be linked to Fintech.

Additionally traditional financial players (like banks, insurers, brokers, stock exchanges, but also traditional financial software vendors like Temenos, Sopra, Fiserv…​) have also caught up in their digitalization and modernization roadmaps and have launched Fintech innovation labs, meaning they can just as well be categorized under Fintech.

We could therefore say that:

  • As technology has become so crucial in the financial services industry, the entire financial services sector can be categorized as Fintech.

  • Due to the rise of ecosystems and embedded finance, financial services companies start to offer more and more services in adjacent sectors (like HR Tech, MarketingTech/MadTech, EdTech, AccountingTech…​) and also players from other industries start to offer more and more financial services. E.g. big tech players like Apple (offering Apple Pay, Apple Pay Later and a credit card together with Goldman Sachs), Uber (offering Uber Wallet and Uber Debit and Credit card), Alibaba (with AliPay) or Grab (with GrabFin and products like Earn+), but also eCommerce players like Shopify (offering Shopify Capital to give fast business loans and cash advances) or TelCo players (like Safaricom’s M-Pesa, Turkcell’s Paycell, Telefónica Movistar Money or Orange Bank) have all entered the financial services sector. As a result, the Fintech boundaries even blur into other sectors.

All this means it becomes very hard to speak about Fintech as a whole.
When things get so messy, categorization is a typical human reflex.
Unfortunately categorization is not that easy as you can categorize across multiples axes (based on product offering, type of customers serviced, region…​) and obviously many players cannot be put in 1 category, as they provide different products and services in different markets.
Nonetheless categorization can still give some interesting insights in the overall market, making it still a very interesting and useful exercise.

When looking at different axes of categorization, I identified following axes (although this list is definitely not complete):

Ax 1: categorize according to the target customer group

This allows to categorize the Fintech industry in 3 large groups:

  • Direct providers of financial services, which will target (end-) customers directly. This group can be split in B2C (e.g. neobanks like Revolut and Monzo), B2B (e.g. neobanks like Starling Bank) or even B2B2C players (i.e. offering a service to a private customer, but via a business paying for this service, e.g. Klarna) players. Often Fintech players will also target a specific customer niche, which is underserved or not sufficiently and personally addressed, e.g. freelancers (e.g. Lili), immigrants (e.g. Majority), women (e.g. Herconomy), the LGBTQ+ community (e.g. Pride bank or Daylight), specific professions (lawyers, doctors, artists…​)…​

  • Providers of services and products for (other) financial service companies (like incumbent banks and insurers, but also other new (disruptive Fintech) players). This group can be split according to which companies they offer services to, i.e. services to incumbent banks, incumbent insurers, incumbent infrastructure players or new (Fintech) players. Examples in this group are the traditional financial software vendors like Temenos, Fiserv, SOPRA…​, but also new players like e.g. ComplyAdvantage.

  • Providers of services and products to companies in other sectors(companies requiring financial data or services to provide a better user experience for their customers) to make a bridge (integrate) to financial services. Obviously this group can be split depending on which other sector they offer financial service integration services to, e.g. eCommerce, HR & Payroll Tech, MobilityTech, AccountingTech, MadTech, Real Estate Tech…​ Examples in this group are PSPs like Stripe, Paypal and Adyen.

Ax 2: categorize according to the disruptive nature of the company

  • Fintechs offering existing financial services and products. These are players that are typically challenging existing players by offering similar services and products but cheaper, more digital and/or with a better user experience. Often they target also specific groups which are excluded or underserved (e.g. products and services not adapted to their specific needs and desires) in the traditional financial landscape (i.e. financial inclusion). In this category, you can find the typical neo-banks or challenger banks (e.g. Revolut, Monzo, N26…​), which still sell mainly traditional banking products, like current and saving accounts, credits, investments and/or debit and credit cards.
    In this category we can also find trading/investment platforms like e.g. Robinhood.

  • Fintechs offering visible value-added services on top of existing financial service products, typically offering a more guided advise and more embedded experiences. Typical examples are robo-advisors and personal financial management tools, but also financial marketplaces (e.g. Raisin for deposits) and price comparators (e.g. Financer.com).

  • Fintechs acting as an invisible back-end supplier to traditional financial players. This category provides software and business processing outsourcing to financial players.

  • Fintechs offering alternative financial services and products, i.e. products and services which challenge the existing landscape in a more fundamental way, by redesigning the intermediation function of banks and insurers. Typical examples in this category are P2P lenders, crowdfunding, DeFi…​

This categorization will also determine if the Fintech player acts as a competitor, partner or supplier of existing incumbent players.

Often Fintechs start in the first category (disrupting the market with large ambitions), but soon notice the difficulties and costs to attack the market directly and therefore pivot into partnering with existing players to profit from their existing reputation, expertise, financial means and customer basis. For the incumbent player, they offer a very quick and low risk way to offer additional innovative services to their customers.

Ax 3: categorize according to the type and extend of the services offered by the company

Obviously software is always an integral part of the service offering of every Fintech, but this software can be the main product or a supporting tool to offer another service.
We can make a split-up based on:

  • Is the company offering only 1 specific product or a whole range, e.g. a specific product could be a RegTech vendor (e.g. Chainalysis), while BaaS players (Banking as a Service, e.g. solarisBank, MangoPay, Marqeta…​) typically offer a whole range of products?

  • Is the focus on selling software or is the software an enabler to sell other services, i.e. financial services, business process outsourcing, legal/compliance/risk management…​? E.g. traditional financial software providers (e.g. Temenos, SOPRA, FiServ, Infosys..) are still offering solutions deployed on-premise (or in private cloud) and via a licensing model, but more and more companies (including those traditional players) are offering their software in a SaaS (software as a service) model or even a BaaS model (Business/Banking as a Service).

  • Is the company also using its licenses obtained from financial regulators (e.g. banking license, payment institution license, electronic money institution license, credit institution license…​) as a commercial proposition?

Ax 4: categorize according to the type of service and/or product offered

This is a type of categorization which is very commonly used and even got a specific terminology, in follow-up of the term Fintech, like WealthTech, RegTech…​
The typical categories here are:

  • BankTech (Digital banking). This group contains on the one hand the disruptive neobanks like Chime, Nubank, Revolut, Monzo, Atom, N26 or Starling and on the other hand the BaaS (Banking as a Service) platforms like solarisBank, Bankable or Cambr. We could also include in this category (although often also put as a separate category) the PFM companies (Personal Financial Management), that offer advice and help with budgeting, e.g. Mint, Acorns, PocketGuard, Level Money, YNAB (You Need A Budget), Intuit, Wally…​

  • WealthTech (Digital Wealth Management): this contains a whole group of Fintech offerings to invest money in financial assets (like stocks, bonds…​) in a better way (more user friendly, cheaper, more automated…​). This category can be split-up in 2 sub-blocks, i.e.:

    • RoboAdvisors, offering smart algorithm technology to provide investment advise and recommendations. E.g. Wealthfront, Acorns, Betterment, Wealthsimple, Charles Schwab, Vanguard…​

    • Retail Investment platforms, e.g. Robinhood, Tradier, E*Trade, Interactive Brokers, iCapital…​

  • LendingTech or LendTech (Credits): providing all types of new digital solutions to consumers and businesses (usually small businesses) for lending money in a more efficient and faster way (often using new technologies like AI/ML, digital identity management…​). This space is enormous as well, going from P2P Lending (like LendingClub, Prosper or OnDeck) and Crowdlending platforms (like Indiegogo, Kickstarter, GoFundMe or Patreon), over BNPL (Buy Now Pay Later, like Affirm, Klarna or AfterPay) all the way to digital lenders (like Funding Circle, Kabbage, Lendio, Lending Club, SoFi or Better Mortgage), credits based on new collaterals like invoicing factoring (e.g. Bluevine, Resolve, altLine…​) and alternative credit (scoring) systems (e.g. micro-lending) allowing to offer credits to the unbanked and underbanked (like Credit Karma, Nova Credit, Quizzle, Credit Sesame or Tala).

  • RegTech: this group of companies helps financial service firms via innovative technology to meet regulatory compliance and security rules, with a strong focus on AML (Anti-Money Laundering), KYC (Know Your Customer protocols) and all financial directives like Basel II/III/IV, FATCA, MiFID, Solvency II…​ Often those companies provide also access to large amounts of financial research and data, used to verify compliance of customers and transactions. Examples are companies like Alyne, Suade, DataGuard, ComplyAdvantage, Fenergo, Onfido, Chainalysis, Ascent Regtech, Hummingbird…​

  • InsurTech: these companies seek to use technical innovation to simplify and streamline the insurance business model. Typically they focus on delivering insurance quotes online in a matter of minutes , digitize the whole claim management process and provide alternative insurance underwriting (using new data sources), e.g. Usage Based Insurance (UBI). Examples are companies like Oscar Health, Gusto, Clover Health, Lemonade, Qover, Digit Insurance, Policy Bazaar…​

  • PayTech (Payment technology): these companies provide different tools to make payment transactions as secure and efficient (frictionless) as possible. A lot of well-known (Fintech) names are in this space, like Paypal, VISA, MasterCard, Stripe, Venmo, AliPay, Adyen, Mollie, Square, Wise, Ripple, iZettle…​ This category can be split in players that

    • Facilitate payments for merchants both physical via point-of-sale devices and online (e.g. Stripe, Paypal, VIVA Wallet, Adyen, Mollie, SumUp…​),

    • Provide new mobile payment solutions (P2P and with merchants), like Venmo, Payconiq, AliPay…​

    • Facilitate international money transfers, like Wise or Ripple

  • Infrastructure players who provide the underlying gateways and connectivity to other players in the industry (other banks, stock exchanges, data providers, regulatory instances…​). Important in this group are the players offering services to enable and consume Open Banking, like Tink, Plaid or TrueLayer.

  • Infrastructure players who provide the underlying gateways and connectivity to other players in the industry (other banks, stock exchanges, data providers, regulatory instances…​). Important in this group are the players offering services to enable and consume Open Banking, like Tink, Plaid or TrueLayer.

  • Crypto, Blockchain & DeFi players: this group contains all companies building a new financial (eco)system, based on a distributed ledger technology (blockchain). This ecosystem is very disruptive, as it challenges the ground rules of our financial system. Companies like Coinbase, Alchemy, Ava Labs, Circle, Kraken, Binance, Gemini Cryptocurrency are most known in this space. Obviously this space can be split-up in multiple sub-categories like crypto-currency exchanges/trading platforms, crypto-wallet providers, NFT marketplaces, crypto-saving and crypto-lending players, players offering tooling to setup new blockchains…​

Ax 5: categorize according to the country and/or region where the company is mainly active (generating its revenues).

Obviously we can split-up based on continents, regions and/or individual countries, but often we see a mix, based on common characteristics in regulation and in culture.

First there are a few countries which due to their size (both in population and general economy, but often also more specifically due to their size of their financial services sector) and specifics. In the first place we identify here the US (main hubs in Silicon Valley, e.g. Stripe, Coinbase, Chime, Plaid, Paypal or Robinhood and New York, e.g. Better.com, Oscar, Chainalysis or Betterment), China (main hub: Beijing, e.g. Waterdrop, Ant Financial, Tencent or Lufax), India (main hub: Bengaluru, e.g. Razorpay, Digit Insurance or CRED) and Russia (main hub: Moscow, e.g. Tinkoff, Sber Bank or Yandex.Money), but we can also include Canada (main hub: Toronto, e.g. Wealthsimple, FreshBooks or Clearco), Australia (main hub: Melbourne, e.g. Afterpay or Airwallex), the UK (main hub: London, e.g. Checkout.com, Revolut, OakNorth or Blockchain.com) and even Israel(main hub: Tel Aviv, e.g. eToro) in this list.

Then there are regions, with a lot of commonalities, where often Fintechs active in one country will quite fast expand to other countries in that same region, e.g. South-East Asia (main hubs in Singapore, e.g. Arttha, Go-Jek or Coda Payments, Hong Kong, e.g. Amber Group or Babel Finance and Jakarta in Indonesia, e.g. OVO, Mandiri or Linkaja), the Middle East(main hubs in Dubai, e.g. Souqalmal.com or Beehive and Abu Dhabi, e.g. NymCard), LatAm (main hub: São Paulo Brasil, e.g. Nubank, C6 Bank or Creditas), the European Union (main hubs in Paris, e.g. Qonto, Sorare, Alan or Ledger, Amsterdam/The Hague, e.g. Adyen, Mollie, Mambu or Bunq, Berlin, e.g. N26, wefox or Trade Republic, Dublin, e.g. Stripeo or WordRemit and Vilnius Lithuania, e.g. Kevin, Nordigen or Bankera), Scandinavia (main hub: Stockholm, e.g. Klarna) or Africa (main hubs in Johannesburg South Africa, e.g. Prosperian Capital or Pineapple, LagosNigeria, e.g. Opay, Flutterwave or Paga and Nairobi Kenia, e.g. Abacus or CarePay).

Hope this can give an idea of how the Fintech industry could be categorized. As a Fintech start-up it’s important to know in which category you are positioned today and which (adjacent) categories you are aspiring in the medium and long-term.
Opportunistic pivoting might also be required. E.g. many Fintechs start in a disruptive model (competing against incumbents), but gradually transform to a partner/supplier model with incumbents. E.g. A lot of neobanks are focusing strongly on a BaaS model (e.g. Starling bank "Starling as a Service" or Fidor bank) or certain PFM apps have switched in offering infrastructure and value-added services directly to banks (e.g. Tink or Cake). But the opposite can exist as well, i.e. Fintechs offering value-added services can become so successful, that they can start expanding to all banking services and products.

Obviously each category comes with its own complexities. A business model based on an improving of existing products and services means a lot of competition and thus a lot of upfront investment to stand out of all other players (cfr. neobanks), while alternative or innovative products mean less competition, but require a challenging and pioneering journey (on technology, marketing and legal/regulatory domains) of convincing customers of the need of the product (shaping a new market).

Check out all my blogs on https://bankloch.blogspot.com/

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Transforming the insurance sector to an Open API Ecosystem

1. Introduction "Open" has recently become a new buzzword in the financial services industry, i.e.   open data, open APIs, Open Banking, Open Insurance …​, but what does this new buzzword really mean? "Open" refers to the capability of companies to expose their services to the outside world, so that   external partners or even competitors   can use these services to bring added value to their customers. This trend is made possible by the technological evolution of   open APIs (Application Programming Interfaces), which are the   digital ports making this communication possible. Together companies, interconnected through open APIs, form a true   API ecosystem , offering best-of-breed customer experience, by combining the digital services offered by multiple companies. In the   technology sector   this evolution has been ongoing for multiple years (think about the travelling sector, allowing you to book any hotel online). An excelle...
55 comments
Read more

Are product silos in a bank inevitable?

Silo thinking   is often frowned upon in the industry. It is often a synonym for bureaucratic processes and politics and in almost every article describing the threats of new innovative Fintech players on the banking industry, the strong bank product silos are put forward as one of the main blockages why incumbent banks are not able to (quickly) react to the changing customer expectations. Customers want solutions to their problems   and do not want to be bothered about the internal organisation of their bank. Most banks are however organized by product domain (daily banking, investments and lending) and by customer segmentation (retail banking, private banking, SMEs and corporates). This division is reflected both at business and IT side and almost automatically leads to the creation of silos. It is however difficult to reorganize a bank without creating new silos or introducing other types of issues and inefficiencies. An organization is never ideal and needs to take a numbe...
6 comments
Read more

RPA - The miracle solution for incumbent banks to bridge the automation gap with neo-banks?

Hypes and marketing buzz words are strongly present in the IT landscape. Often these are existing concepts, which have evolved technologically and are then renamed to a new term, as if it were a brand new technology or concept. If you want to understand and assess these new trends, it is important to   reduce the concepts to their essence and compare them with existing technologies , e.g. Integration (middleware) software   ensures that 2 separate applications or components can be integrated in an easy way. Of course, there is a huge evolution in the protocols, volumes of exchanged data, scalability, performance…​, but in essence the problem remains the same. Nonetheless, there have been multiple terms for integration software such as ETL, ESB, EAI, SOA, Service Mesh…​ Data storage software   ensures that data is stored in such a way that data is not lost and that there is some kind guaranteed consistency, maximum availability and scalability, easy retrieval...
28 comments
Read more

IoT - Revolution or Evolution in the Financial Services Industry

1. The IoT hype We have all heard about the   "Internet of Things" (IoT)   as this revolutionary new technology, which will radically change our lives. But is it really such a revolution and will it really have an impact on the Financial Services Industry? To refresh our memory, the Internet of Things (IoT) refers to any   object , which is able to   collect data and communicate and share this information (like condition, geolocation…​)   over the internet . This communication will often occur between 2 objects (i.e. not involving any human), which is often referred to as Machine-to-Machine (M2M) communication. Well known examples are home thermostats, home security systems, fitness and health monitors, wearables…​ This all seems futuristic, but   smartphones, tablets and smartwatches   can also be considered as IoT devices. More importantly, beside these futuristic visions of IoT, the smartphone will most likely continue to be the cent...
18 comments
Read more

PSD3: The Next Phase in Europe’s Payment Services Regulation

With the successful rollout of PSD2, the European Union (EU) continues to advance innovation in the payments domain through the anticipated introduction of the   Payment Services Directive 3 (PSD3) . On June 28, 2023, the European Commission published a draft proposal for PSD3 and the   Payment Services Regulation (PSR) . The finalized versions of this directive and associated regulation are expected to be available by late 2024, although some predictions suggest a more likely timeline of Q2 or Q3 2025. Given that member states are typically granted an 18-month transition period, PSD3 is expected to come into effect sometime in 2026. Notably, the Commission has introduced a regulation (PSR) alongside the PSD3 directive, ensuring more harmonization across member states as regulations are immediately effective and do not require national implementation, unlike directives. PSD3 shares the same objectives as PSD2, i.e.   increasing competition in the payments landscape and en...
1 comment
Read more

Trade-offs Are Inevitable in Software Delivery - Remember the CAP Theorem

In the world of financial services, the integrity of data systems is fundamentally reliant on   non-functional requirements (NFRs)   such as reliability and security. Despite their importance, NFRs often receive secondary consideration during project scoping, typically being reduced to a generic checklist aimed more at compliance than at genuine functionality. Regrettably, these initial NFRs are seldom met after delivery, which does not usually prevent deployment to production due to the vague and unrealistic nature of the original specifications. This common scenario results in significant end-user frustration as the system does not perform as expected, often being less stable or slower than anticipated. This situation underscores the need for   better education on how to articulate and define NFRs , i.e. demanding only what is truly necessary and feasible within the given budget. Early and transparent discussions can lead to system architecture being tailored more close...
Post a Comment
Read more

Low- and No-code platforms - Will IT developers soon be out of a job?

“ The future of coding is no coding at all ” - Chris Wanstrath (CEO at GitHub). Mid May I posted a blog on RPA (Robotic Process Automation -   https://bankloch.blogspot.com/2020/05/rpa-miracle-solution-for-incumbent.html ) on how this technology, promises the world to companies. A very similar story is found with low- and no-code platforms, which also promise that business people, with limited to no knowledge of IT, can create complex business applications. These   platforms originate , just as RPA tools,   from the growing demand for IT developments , while IT cannot keep up with the available capacity. As a result, an enormous gap between IT teams and business demands is created, which is often filled by shadow-IT departments, which extend the IT workforce and create business tools in Excel, Access, WordPress…​ Unfortunately these tools built in shadow-IT departments arrive very soon at their limits, as they don’t support the required non-functional requirements (like h...
15 comments
Read more

An overview of 1-year blogging

Last week I published my   60th post   on my blog called   Bankloch   (a reference to "Banking" and my family name). The past year, I have published a blog on a weekly basis, providing my humble personal vision on the topics of Fintech, IT software delivery and mobility. This blogging has mainly been a   personal enrichment , as it forced me to dive deep into a number of different topics, not only in researching for content, but also in trying to identify trends, innovations and patterns into these topics. Furthermore it allowed me to have several very interesting conversations and discussions with passionate colleagues in the financial industry and to get more insights into the wonderful world of blogging and more general of digital marketing, exploring subjects and tools like: Search Engine Optimization (SEO) LinkedIn post optimization Google Search Console Google AdWorks Google Blogger Thinker360 Finextra …​ Clearly it is   not easy to get the necessary ...
9 comments
Read more

The UPI Phenomenon: From Zero to 10 Billion

If there is one Indian innovation that has grabbed   global headlines , it is undoubtedly the instant payment system   UPI (Unified Payments Interface) . In August 2023, monthly UPI transactions exceeded an astounding 10 billion, marking a remarkable milestone for India’s payments ecosystem. No wonder that UPI has not only revolutionized transactions in India but has also gained international recognition for its remarkable growth. Launched in 2016 by the   National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI)   in collaboration with 21 member banks, UPI quickly became popular among consumers and businesses. In just a few years, it achieved   remarkable milestones : By August 2023, UPI recorded an unprecedented   10.58 billion transactions , with an impressive 50% year-on-year growth. This volume represented approximately   190 billion euros . In July 2023, the UPI network connected   473 different banks . UPI is projected to achieve a staggering   1 ...
1 comment
Read more

AI in Financial Services - A buzzword that is here to stay!

In a few of my most recent blogs I tried to   demystify some of the buzzwords   (like blockchain, Low- and No-Code platforms, RPA…​), which are commonly used in the financial services industry. These buzzwords often entail interesting innovations, but contrary to their promise, they are not silver bullets solving any problem. Another such buzzword is   AI   (or also referred to as Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Enforced Learning…​ - the difference between those terms put aside). Again this term is also seriously hyped, creating unrealistic expectations, but contrary to many other buzzwords, this is something I truly believe will have a much larger impact on the financial services industry than many other buzzwords. This opinion is backed by a study of McKinsey and PWC indicating that 72% of company leaders consider that AI will be the most competitive advantage of the future and that this technology will be the most disruptive force in the decades to come. Deep Lea...
10 comments
Read more